Just as I begin to work on a series of posts on the need for non-partisanship, along comes an event, the likes of which many have never witnessed in the Canadian Parliament before. And it was a doozy.
A Prime Minister, promising in a throne speech a few days previous to work with the other parties to tackle a quickly descending economic situation, unleashes a fiscal update that all but blisters the paint off of any goodwill that might indeed have remained in the House. His brazen attack on all three opposition parties completely changed the dynamic of the Chamber in seconds – perhaps forever.
It’s not what we expected. To be sure, certain portions of the update had been leaked a day earlier, but the sheer scope of the Prime Minister’s statement suddenly laid bare everything that we had all feared might dwell beneath the veneer of the government’s civility. In that moment at least, we stared into a kind of abyss and didn’t like its depth. What fascinated me were the faces of the Conservative MPs during the reading of the statement itself. They appeared on edge, worried, and more than a little apprehensive, as if they knew danger was ahead.
No sooner was the speech ended than the Prime Minister and his Finance Minister left the House, along with half of the Conservative caucus. The faces on those that remained told the story in vivid detail. Listening to the response from the three opposition parties, you could tell from their countenance some kind of line had been crossed.
In the Opposition Lobby, I saw things I had never witnessed in my two years here. Bloc members were “high-fiving” NDP caucus members, and some women from the Bloc were embracing their counterparts in the Liberal caucus. It was incredible to watch.
There’s no need to say more about such events because they are playing out in real time in the media and could well result in the overthrow of the present Conservative government. And I don’t want to get “off-track” from my ruminations on non-partisanship. In fact, I can’t think of a better introduction for the need for such an outlook than what has just been recounted above.
What we saw this week was rank hyper-partisanship vividly displayed in brilliant parliamentary technicolor. This kind of extreme partisanship has characterized Parliament for a few years now and its price has been a paralyzing inability to confront the most difficult problems facing the nation – healthcare, the environment, Afghanistan, and of course, the deteriorating economy. On the controversial issues, meaningful progress is all but impossible without a true spirit of common purpose, of non-partisan cooperation.
With the kick-off of this new parliament just a few weeks ago, Stephen Harper started out with over half the country alienated from him. And when he set about to undermine the parties representing that majority of voters in opposition, he sealed his own fate. By starting the session this way, he compounded his problems with his own unique style of polarizing the country, making it almost impossible to put Humpty Dumpty back together again.
With that now behind us, let’s get back to our focus: the need to recapture the kind of effective governance over the long term that only a spirit of non-partisanship can bring. Prime ministers who divide rarely conquer. Let’s consider how we might bring the country back together in a meaningful way.



[...] another, last Thursday in Parliament will eventually be the stuff of undergraduate history texts. Here is how Mr. Pearson saw [...]
And now, to apparently demonstrate that they are willing to surreptitiously tape record, a caucus meeting of their political rivals. Are they insane? How would Canadians feel if the government can surreptitiously record their private, professional or business conversations or transactions and publicly release them for partisanship gains? Even if this is not criminal, and I would be extremely surprised and upset if it isn’t, the message that Harper has clearly sent to many Canadians this morning is that he will apparently stop at nothing, to keep his power.
Do the conservatives really believe that they will ever win their coveted majority this way? 62% of voters, the majority, already voted against the Conservative party. What is the next step — institute surveillance of the voters who do not support this government? If Harper did not authorize this, and it is difficult to see how this could be since the public release apparently came from the PMO, he should immediately fire the person(s) responsible. At least with the puffin incident, I believe the person was suspended although he is now probably reinstated. The puffin incident was juvenile, this incident goes against the basic fabric of ethics and democracy.
It’s inconceivable that the Harper government would choose to demonstrate to the nation their complete disregard for the economic crisis in favour of their neo-con ideology. He left the opposition parties no choice but to join forces and call for a vote of non-confidence.
The high-fiving part had me grinning.
[...] the Opposition Lobby, I saw things I had never witnessed in my two years here. Bloc members were “high-fiving” NDP caucus members, and some women from the Bloc were embracing their counterparts in the Liberal [...]
I believe that the mandate to govern for Mr. Harper and the Conservatives has run out. Mr. Harper must now realise that his own neo-con agenda is bankrupt with the world changing, and he should ask Her Excellancy, the Governor-General to ask Mr. Dion to form and lead a coalition government to tackle the crisis that is hitting Canada.
Hello Glen,This is Rubie Britton writing. You have a LEADER,-one that is both Truthfull and Knowledgable.His name is “Stephone Dion.”
There was backbiting within the Liberal Party as far back as with Cretien.Paul Martin with his Silver tongue,and others were “out to get Cretien.”
Don’t they know that’s where it all began.The Liberals were in a downward spiral.Do you not think that Paul Martin lost votes? The people never rallied! It was not just Dion.
The Liberals Have a Leader,Stephone Dion. Don’t bring in the Guy that went to Afghanistan for Harper or the guy that is running a Bank now,Frank Mc Kenna.He was part of the Cargyle Group.
We also know that that Jack Layton is Knashing at the Bit to be Prime Minister.
I leave it with you.Sincerely,Rubie Britton,Apt.100,100Ridout Street South ,London,Ontario,N6c 3X5.
E-mail: rubie1002000@yahoo.com.
I voted for you and the liberals for the first time… Never again.. i dont want NDP ideology or Bloc support.. Dion is incapable and this is a waste of time…. Look at the market response today.. Down over 9% you guys need to give your head a shake. i dont hear your plans i dont hear your timetable..You have let Layton run the table… i am so sorry i voted Liberal..
Now Rae and the others can run for Prime Minister and again i lose my vote.. Gawd no wonder we cant stand on the world stage and be credible..
The reality is and Glen i am surprised by the smugness of the Liberal leaders and NDP….
Now the GG will eed to make a decision she is all to incapable of doing so..
PS i have been umemployed since July and dont see any of you really helping …..
This is a wonderful thing you’re doing – writing about the events in parlament for all to read about. It really helps to see the insider’s perspective on things. I have been following current events and politics in Canada very earnestly over the past year. And as a USAer I am very refreshed by the candor of all of you in Canadian government. You have a national poltical system which seems to be designed a lot better than our down here in the usa.
The conservative party in Canada reminds me of what the republicans in the usa used to be like decades ago. And it’s good food for thought to watch the social dynamics play out up there. I was watching question time this morning through the CBC’s live video feed, and I was really intrigued with the social interplay.
It seems to me that the Canadian Conservatives are a party of the rich. They wish to be an aristocracy. And they use a form of intellectualism as an envelope or as wrapping paper to contain their agendas and ideas. It seems to me that they are all about tactics and not about substance. As a critical thinker, when I compare notes with a lot of their reasoning, there seem to be real flaws in it. And yet, they are seen by the public as the party of intellectualism.
If you are successful at putting together a coalition, I would love to see a fourth left wing political party in Canada which would be made up of philosopher-types, and scholars who were very forthright about their reasoning processes. How are they going to address the issues of state from an analytical standpoint?
Elizabeth May and the green party seem to be doing this… but the movement needs to be a lot larger than just that group, I think. There’s a lot of political impetus here in the usa within a coalition on the internet of people who are from both the far left and the far right wings… these are the people who organized to fill Obama’s pockets with all this money for his campaign over the past year. They’re a very intellectual group of people, and are very critical of the republican party in its current state. I imagine that passion might soon flow across the border into Canada, and once it does, it will need to be given a home; it will have to be harnessed for constructive purposes. I would love to see it come in to abet all of the hard work which the rest of you are doing up there in the Liberal party, the NDP, and the Bloc Québécois.
Anyhoo, I think it’s so wonderful that Stéphane Dion is going to be the prime minister! The meek, gentle, and caring person can win up in Canada, simply through the merits of his own honour and integrity – even in the face of blistering attacks on his character by his political rivals! This gives me hope. Dion is just the right person for the job. He seems like a consensus builder, rather than a go-it-alone kind of guy like Stephen Harper.
Anyway… again, thank you for writing about the events you see around you up there in Ottawa. You have a disarming and transparent manner of talking about things – and that makes your posts very refreshing for us to read, Mr. Pearson.
Glen:
Thank you for your thoughtson the issues that we are now faced with.
I believe that the Liberals should have trounced the Harper conservatives in the last election; after all he broke his promiseabout holding an election at that timeand there were a number of egregious steps during the campaign.One of the major reasons we did not winwas the leader of the party. Mr Dionis a decent and principled manbut he is not a politician.Raeand Ignatieffare also principled menbut they are also politicians. paul Martin is a decent mantoo butunfortunately not a politician.
The whole positionof this governmentas Isee it ispretty hideous. They are playingthe same sortof lousy retail politicsas their cousinssouth of the borderand do not deserve the confidenceof the House of Commonsnorofthemajority of Canadians.
Thank you Glen, and all the good people who gave Canadians something to be proud of today.
I feel eliminating the tax payer subsidies to all parties would be detrimental to my democractic right to have many choices at the ballot box and provide me with less choice. Continue to stand up to the bullying from the Conservatives.